Dear Ms. Fratti,
As per your column in today's Bucks County Courier Times, "She Works to Make Things Better," Representative Tina Davis sounds like an unpretentious individual, who wants to provide quality constituent services. Unlike some of her colleagues, however, Representative Davis does NOT offer a regular email address on her web site. Hence, I would appreciate your forwarding this question to her....
As per the Philadelphia Grand Jury report in the matter of Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his associates, "We ourselves cover a spectrum of personal beliefs about the morality of abortion. For us as a criminal grand jury, however, the case is not about that controversy; it is about disregard of the law and disdain for the lives and health of mothers and infants. We find common ground in exposing what happened here, and in recommending measures to prevent anything like this from ever happening again."
Among its recommendations, the Grand Jury report stated that "The Pennsylvania Department of Health should license abortion clinics as ambulatory surgical facilities." Pennsylvania House Bill 574 would do just that. While it would seem unfathomable that anyone would oppose such corrective action, Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates is firmly opposed.
In the 2010 elections, Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates specifically listed local Representatives Steve Santarsiero (31st), Tina Davis (141st), & Frank Farry (142nd), as well as local Senator Chuck McIlhinney (10th) as "pro-choice endorsed candidates."
Will Representative Tina Davis (as well as Santarsiero, Davis, & Farry) be able to defy her Planned Parenthood backers and do the right thing, regarding HB 574?
Sincerely,
No comments:
Post a Comment