U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
On July 27, 2017, the EEOC found that Sam's Club (a subsidiary of Walmart) discriminated against a "transgender" employee, violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The commission noted that the health plan categorically denied coverage of "transgender treatment/ sex therapy" and that this is "medically necessary care that would have been covered if not for her [sic] transgender status."
Pennsylvania
On August 1, 2017, the Pine-Richland School District settled the lawsuit that was brought by three "transgender" high school students (Evancho v. Pine-Richland School District). The district agreed to change the policy to one that affirms a student's "gender identity." The student may access the opposite sex facilities or single-user restrooms, and "gender identity" will be added to the district's nondiscrimination policies. The district also paid an undisclosed monetary sum. A federal judge in Pennsylvania had issued a preliminary injunction in February, granting the transgender students' motion based on equal protection but not Title IX grounds.
Also in PA, this August, a federal judge denied an injunction in Doe v. Boyertown Area School District, ruling in favor of the "transgender" students while the lawsuit moves forward.
Wisconsin
The Dane County Circuit Court announced on August 1, 2017 that, in the case of Amy Lynn Photography Studio v. City of Madison, the photographer is not subject to the city's nondiscrimination statutes regarding public accommodations since she does not have a storefront.
Kentucky
On August 9, 2017, a "transgender woman" and "her" husband filed a federal lawsuit against Amazon.com in Kentucky, alleging sex discrimination and violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The suit is Lane v. Amazon.com KYDC LLC
Texas
On August 10, 2017, three Houston city employees filed a federal lawsuit over the potential denial of benefits to same-sex "spouses." This comes after the Texas Supreme Court sent a case back to a lower court with the ruling that the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell did not answer the question of whether employers were required to offer spousal benefits to same-sex "spouses."
Colorado
On August 17, 2017 two women filed a federal discrimination lawsuit against one of their former employers, the Colorado-based Cherry Creek Mortgage. The employer allegedly refused to offer spousal benefits to the employee's same-sex "spouse" because of their policy to cover only "spouses who are in a legal union between one man and one woman." Cherry Creek is a "Christian-based" company.
No comments:
Post a Comment